Skip to content
Enhancing Rural Community Capacity
Enhancing Rural Community Capacity

Enhancing Rural Community Capacity

  • Home
  • Resources
    • Articles and Fact Sheets
    • Tools of Community Development
    • Virtual Learning Center

Tag: groups

Posted on July 12, 2019July 12, 2019

Is there a "best" size for a committee?

The “best size” for a committee or working group is the size that enables the group to get its work done effectively and efficiently. Thus, the best number of people for one project might be five, while the best size …

Search

Connect With Us

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Categories

  • Enhancing Rural Community Capacity

Tags

  • asset-based community development
  • bio
  • building capacity
  • capacity building
  • committees
  • community
  • community development
  • community planning and zoning
  • decision making
  • decisions
  • economic development
  • effective groups
  • enhancing rural capacity
  • entrepreneurs and their communities
  • entrepreneurship
  • erc
  • ercc
  • evaluation
  • faciliation
  • facilitation
  • focus groups
  • fop
  • front page
  • group management
  • group process
  • groups
  • impact
  • logic model
  • managing groups
  • meeting facilitation
  • meeting management
  • planning
  • private value
  • public participation in planning
  • public value
  • ripple effects mapping
  • rural capacity
  • rural capacity webinars
  • rural development
  • social capital
  • strategic planning
  • swot
  • tools
  • womeninag
  • women in ag learning network

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About eXtension

  • eXtension Members
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use

eXtension

Powered by eXtension

© 2020 eXtension. All rights reserved.

This is a national Cooperative Extension resource

This work is supported by New Technologies for Agriculture Extension grant no. 2015-41595-24254 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Proudly powered by WordPress